Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 13 of 18 benchmarks against GPT-5.1 Codex Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 1310, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 72.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 88.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 55.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 65.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 75.0% on Aider Polyglot compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 60.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1289 on Design Arena ELO compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 1087, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1298 on Website Arena ELO compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 1123.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 78.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 92.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 85.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 52.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 35.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 400K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini costs $0.25/1M input and $2.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 170 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 180 ms for GPT-5.1 Codex Mini. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 55.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
Yes, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini costs $0.25/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is faster, generating output at 170 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.