Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4 Fast
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 12 of 16 benchmarks against Grok 4 Fast by xAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Grok 4 Fast's 1370, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Grok 4 Fast's 80.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to Grok 4 Fast's 85.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Grok 4 Fast's 48.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Grok 4 Fast's 52.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1289 on Design Arena ELO compared to Grok 4 Fast's 1107, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1298 on Website Arena ELO compared to Grok 4 Fast's 1099.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Grok 4 Fast's 84.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Grok 4 Fast's 94.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 85.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Grok 4 Fast's 60.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Grok 4 Fast's 38.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Grok 4 Fast's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/1M input and $0.50/1M output. Grok 4 Fast is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Grok 4 Fast's 110 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 220 ms for Grok 4 Fast. Grok 4 Fast delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Grok 4 Fast is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4 Fast — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Grok 4 Fast?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (12 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Grok 4 Fast for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 48.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Grok 4 Fast?
Yes, Grok 4 Fast is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Grok 4 Fast?
Grok 4 Fast is faster, generating output at 110 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4 Fast comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.