Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 14 of 20 benchmarks against Claude Sonnet 4 by Anthropic, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 1365, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 81.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 87.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 88.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4 scores 72.7% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 63.8%, while both score 58.0% on LiveCodeBench, while Claude Sonnet 4 scores 37.6 on AA Coding Index compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 33.3, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1164 on Design Arena ELO compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 1145, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1179 on Website Arena ELO compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 1151.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 85.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 94.5%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 79.9% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 76.7%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 42.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4 scores 68.0% on τ²-Bench Airline compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 61.3%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 1.0M.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 generates output at 75 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Claude Sonnet 4 versus 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Claude Sonnet 4 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and speed, Claude Sonnet 4 has the edge. For those who value general intelligence and math and affordability, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Sonnet 4 compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4 is better for coding, scoring 72.7% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 63.8%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper. Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4 is faster, generating output at 75 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 20 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.