Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 15 of 20 benchmarks against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1280, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 80.5%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 30.4 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 9.3.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 80.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 35.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 38.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 68.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 16.3, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1256 on Design Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 896, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1246 on Website Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 883.
Math: In math, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on MATH compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 74.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 89.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 65.7%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 22.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 10.3 on AA Agentic Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 0.6, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.3% on τ²-Bench Airline compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 44.6%.
Context: In context, both score 1.0M on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20/1M input and $0.70/1M output. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 100 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 250 ms for Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (15 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Llama 4 Maverick for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 35.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Yes, Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20/1M input and $0.70/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is faster, generating output at 100 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison cover?
This comparison covers 20 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.